<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Yet Another) Social Backlash on GoDaddy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/</link>
	<description>Life is a Startup</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxine Vivienne</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-5297</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxine Vivienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-5297</guid>
		<description>GoDaddy may get attention, but they lose business. Sure I&#039;ve heard of them and they might be the fastest solution for a website, but seriously, GoDaddy.com is now synonymous with... you know what.
On a side note many NASCAR fans have a poor opinion Danica because her willingness to sell herself this way. There are lot of other women in racing who are better, but Danica gets all the attention because of things like this. Its not helping her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoDaddy may get attention, but they lose business. Sure I&#8217;ve heard of them and they might be the fastest solution for a website, but seriously, GoDaddy.com is now synonymous with&#8230; you know what.<br />
On a side note many NASCAR fans have a poor opinion Danica because her willingness to sell herself this way. There are lot of other women in racing who are better, but Danica gets all the attention because of things like this. Its not helping her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Shiva</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-5051</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Shiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-5051</guid>
		<description>I signed up with GoDaddy when they first started, before they started selling girls. I got totally sick of that and moved all my domains to www.name.com. Same good prices, reliable service and no sleazy advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up with GoDaddy when they first started, before they started selling girls. I got totally sick of that and moved all my domains to <a href="http://www.name.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.name.com</a>. Same good prices, reliable service and no sleazy advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Escobar</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Escobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-436</guid>
		<description>@David Cooley: Links are fixed, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David Cooley: Links are fixed, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-435</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s premature to call it a mass backlash at this point, or akin to the mommy motrin &quot;scandal&quot; (it was a twittage, just not a scandal).

my response:
http://yodaddy.ning.com/profiles/blogs/can-we-really-call-it-a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s premature to call it a mass backlash at this point, or akin to the mommy motrin &#8220;scandal&#8221; (it was a twittage, just not a scandal).</p>
<p>my response:<br />
<a href="http://yodaddy.ning.com/profiles/blogs/can-we-really-call-it-a" rel="nofollow">http://yodaddy.ning.com/profiles/blogs/can-we-really-call-it-a</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyndee Woolley</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyndee Woolley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-434</guid>
		<description>I think this will be a lot like the mommy motrin scandal... Enough to irritate people, but not enough to make a dent in the bottom line. 

As a woman. I&#039;m turned off... but I have more important things to worry about in my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this will be a lot like the mommy motrin scandal&#8230; Enough to irritate people, but not enough to make a dent in the bottom line. </p>
<p>As a woman. I&#8217;m turned off&#8230; but I have more important things to worry about in my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-02-02 &#171; Shashi Bellamkonda - Social Media Swami</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-02-02 &#171; Shashi Bellamkonda - Social Media Swami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-433</guid>
		<description>[...] reading @jungleG&#039;s post (Yet Another) Social Backlash on GoDaddy - social applications and onlin... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading @jungleG&#39;s post (Yet Another) Social Backlash on GoDaddy &#8211; social applications and onlin&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-432</guid>
		<description>I think the mommy bloggers and tweeples tend go overboard with their concern on the GoDaddy commercials.  Anyone who joins GoDaddy has got to know that the company rocketed into mainstream awareness after their first superbowl scandalous ad, so it really shouldn&#039;t come as a shock that they&#039;re using the same ole tried and true tactics that gain them new business.  It was interesting to see on twitter how a couple of companies were immediately capitalizing on the negative sentiment some people felt from the campaign (and the timing when they may act).  check out these tweets:

RT @kdpaine RT @sashib Anyone who wants to move [from godaddy] can email smedia@networksolutions.com &amp; we will take care. #superbowlads

RT @idotz #superbowlads Does your domain register act more like a Porn site? Transfer to register that respects you... #superbowlads

i&#039;m also interested to see how much business they gained or lost....anyone know a way to find that out???  if they gained more than they lost, ten bucks says we&#039;re going to see a similar ad at next year&#039;s superbowl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the mommy bloggers and tweeples tend go overboard with their concern on the GoDaddy commercials.  Anyone who joins GoDaddy has got to know that the company rocketed into mainstream awareness after their first superbowl scandalous ad, so it really shouldn&#8217;t come as a shock that they&#8217;re using the same ole tried and true tactics that gain them new business.  It was interesting to see on twitter how a couple of companies were immediately capitalizing on the negative sentiment some people felt from the campaign (and the timing when they may act).  check out these tweets:</p>
<p>RT @kdpaine RT @sashib Anyone who wants to move [from godaddy] can email <a href="mailto:smedia@networksolutions.com">smedia@networksolutions.com</a> &amp; we will take care. #superbowlads</p>
<p>RT @idotz #superbowlads Does your domain register act more like a Porn site? Transfer to register that respects you&#8230; #superbowlads</p>
<p>i&#8217;m also interested to see how much business they gained or lost&#8230;.anyone know a way to find that out???  if they gained more than they lost, ten bucks says we&#8217;re going to see a similar ad at next year&#8217;s superbowl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron West</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-431</guid>
		<description>You guys are all kidding right?  Lets name some of the other SuperBowl Ads that featured sex as their selling point:

- 1998 and 1999 featured a very sexy women two years in a row
- Britney Spears was featured in multiple Pepsi SB commercials
- &quot;The Twins&quot; multiple SB ads for Coors Light

OK - lets just list female sex symbols that have appeared in an ad:
- Carmen Elektra
- All the Victoria Secrets women

OK - you know what - its not worth it.  Do what you want to do - I for one will not be moving off of GoDaddy.com (and spending extra money to do so) - simply because they had a commercial that someone (not me) found offensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are all kidding right?  Lets name some of the other SuperBowl Ads that featured sex as their selling point:</p>
<p>- 1998 and 1999 featured a very sexy women two years in a row<br />
- Britney Spears was featured in multiple Pepsi SB commercials<br />
- &#8220;The Twins&#8221; multiple SB ads for Coors Light</p>
<p>OK &#8211; lets just list female sex symbols that have appeared in an ad:<br />
- Carmen Elektra<br />
- All the Victoria Secrets women</p>
<p>OK &#8211; you know what &#8211; its not worth it.  Do what you want to do &#8211; I for one will not be moving off of GoDaddy.com (and spending extra money to do so) &#8211; simply because they had a commercial that someone (not me) found offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael j lambie</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>michael j lambie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-430</guid>
		<description>ok, so i host 95% of my domains at godaddy. despite the fact that i don&#039;t care for their advertising, i don&#039;t care to switch. I did see however, that some hosting companies are taking advantage of the godaddy ads as seen on this site:

http://www.namecheap.com/

&quot;Not happy with your current registrar or their advertising methods?&quot; is pasted across their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, so i host 95% of my domains at godaddy. despite the fact that i don&#8217;t care for their advertising, i don&#8217;t care to switch. I did see however, that some hosting companies are taking advantage of the godaddy ads as seen on this site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.namecheap.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.namecheap.com/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Not happy with your current registrar or their advertising methods?&#8221; is pasted across their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cooley</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/02/02/yet-another-social-backlash-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=367#comment-429</guid>
		<description>FYI, Your links are broken to the Name of people leaving comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, Your links are broken to the Name of people leaving comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

