<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Audience is an Audience, Be it on FriendFeed or Anywhere Else</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jungleg.com/2009/06/20/an-audience-is-an-audience-be-it-on-friendfeed-or-anywhere-else/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/06/20/an-audience-is-an-audience-be-it-on-friendfeed-or-anywhere-else/</link>
	<description>Life is a Startup</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Is Your Audience And Are Audiences Different? &#124; Regular Geek</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/06/20/an-audience-is-an-audience-be-it-on-friendfeed-or-anywhere-else/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Is Your Audience And Are Audiences Different? &#124; Regular Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=728#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>[...] dealing with the FeedBurner changes, Jorge Escobar felt that an audience is an audience: if you and your blog are one (which is my personal case) and my blog headlines are being seen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dealing with the FeedBurner changes, Jorge Escobar felt that an audience is an audience: if you and your blog are one (which is my personal case) and my blog headlines are being seen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FriendFeed Discoveries @ DAPancost.com</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/06/20/an-audience-is-an-audience-be-it-on-friendfeed-or-anywhere-else/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendFeed Discoveries @ DAPancost.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=728#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>[...] An Audience is an Audience, Be it on FriendFeed or Anywhere Else via Jorge Escobar &#8212; An interesting commentary on FeedBurner&#8217;s inclusion of FriendFeed subscribers into your FeedBurner subscriber count. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Audience is an Audience, Be it on FriendFeed or Anywhere Else via Jorge Escobar &#8212; An interesting commentary on FeedBurner&#8217;s inclusion of FriendFeed subscribers into your FeedBurner subscriber count. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://jungleg.com/2009/06/20/an-audience-is-an-audience-be-it-on-friendfeed-or-anywhere-else/comment-page-1/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jungleg.com/?p=728#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>Louis Gray has another post where he starts to wonder the same thing, is &quot;subscribers&quot; and old term and potential audience what matters? I started thinking that maybe the potential social reach could be included in feedburner, but separate from the subscriber number and the reach. An additional statistic may not be a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis Gray has another post where he starts to wonder the same thing, is &#8220;subscribers&#8221; and old term and potential audience what matters? I started thinking that maybe the potential social reach could be included in feedburner, but separate from the subscriber number and the reach. An additional statistic may not be a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

