Rob Diana has a provocative post today titled “What Do We Expect From A Startup Exit?” where he puts forward the thought that users should not expect startups to become multibillion corporations, but that exits are something that should be part of their lifecycle.
In effect, users should adopt products like they buy milk: checking their expiration date.
The problem with this approach is that users don’t want invest time and energy into something they would know will expire in 2 or 3 years.
If someone had told me that FriendFeed would disappear for sure in August 2009 back in July 2008, I’m not sure I would have devoted so much time putting my daily life in it. As more and more startups go this route, it’ll become harder and harder for new startups to gather an audience, as people will become paranoid and ask “how long will this one be running for?”
Of course, there are no guarantees in life. But by purchasing startups and closing them, the big boys (VCs and Googles of the world) are doing exactly what they need to do: get people to be afraid of using anything else that’s not them. That is the VC cancer that Jason Fried is talking about.
And this is where innovation suffers. Because if we don’t have the next garage startup that changes the world and leave this to big corporations, we are indeed going to be faced with boring technology until kingdom come.
Users want startups to have something more than an exit strategy. They want startups that will make an impact on their lives and stick around for a long time. It’s very hard to understand how a site works, get enough traction and community around it, implement its APIs, convince our friends to join and so on.
This is work we’re doing for free for them.
So if the exit strategy works for them, shouldn’t we be entitled to a piece of the action as well? Of course I’m being ironic here.
Maybe we need more people like Craig Newark, who is doing it for something else that’s not necessarily money.
{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }
Users want startups with more than an exit strategy – New Blog Post: Check the Expiration Date on Your Favorite Startup – http://j.mp/3AwPSf
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
More from author
I don’t know if my post was provocative, but I’ll take it. I was also not saying that we know something will “expire”. The real idea is that we should not be surprised when it happens. Startups want an exit of some sort, like a purchase or IPO. It is an extremely rare case that a startup can make hundreds of millions of dollars in less than 3 years.
You do bring up a good point though with the big companies buying smaller ones and “introducing user fear”. I have not thought about this angle yet.
More from author
It was provocative as it got my thoughts moving about this aspect of business.
The expiration concept wasn’t meant to be attributed to you, but it’s inherent if you think about it.
Now, a startup does not need to make millions and millions, but just enough to pay the employees and its infrastructure and make a little bit more each year. But this concept nowadays that you either become a millionaire or you failed, is where we’re getting it wrong, IMHO.
More from author
Jorge,
Actually, you made my original point which was really not clear in my post. Why do we see companies that “do OK” as generally failing in the startup world? I totally agree with you on that part.
More from author
Right on! That is the steak on this cheese steak sandwich! ;)
More from author
Check the Expiration Date on Your Favorite Startup http://j.mp/CpnoL
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
More from author
Louis Gray: Check the Expiration Date on Your Favorite Startup http://bit.ly/8R8F9
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
More from author
Check the Expiration Date on Your Favorite Startup http://bit.ly/46iCAv by @jungleg
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
More from author
37signals would be a good example of a startup that isn’t going to be acquired any time soon. Thats maybe why its so successful in its niche.
This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed
More from author
That’s probably true Anthony, and that’s why they can see things differently
This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed
More from author