From the category archives:

Blogging

A pivot is defined as a quick turn by either a company or a project. Sometimes it’s like a shift in focus in a small startup. Other times we see it in companies as large as Google, when it announced  it was shutting down Google Buzz, a service that it announced to great fanfare but had not quite caught up.

As you can imagine, a pivot is something that can be quite stressful for any entrepreneur, as it means changing the direction of the business, sometimes radically. It might require an extra amount of cash or runway that you don’t have. And of course, no one will guarantee that this shift will mean success for the project.

One of the companies I previously worked with, ExpoTV, had not one, but two major pivots. In a candid interview, Bill Hildebolt shared some thoughts about this process with Zack Mansfield:

Having been an entrepreneur for a few years now, I believe the truism that every technology start-up pivots. That said, I also believe successful entrepreneurs start with an idea that they are passionate about. So it’s somewhat paradoxical: to be a successful entrepreneur, you need to be passionate about an idea. But to have a successful company, you have to throw that idea out and do something different. I think this goes a long to explaining the failure rate at start-ups and also why you see so many founders leave relatively early in a company’s development.

Eric Reis, who has written The Lean Startup book talks about pivots in this blog post:

I want to introduce the concept of the pivot, the idea that successful startups change directions but stay grounded in what they’ve learned. They keep one foot in the past and place one foot in a new possible future. Over time, this pivoting may lead them far afield from their original vision, but if you look carefully, you’ll be able to detect common threads that link each iteration. By contrast, many unsuccessful startups simply jump outright from one vision to something completely different. These jumps are extremely risky, because they don’t leverage the validated learning about customers that came before.

It is important that your recognize the signs that your startup needs to pivot well in advance, so that you change direction and align the resources before it’s too late. Some of these signs can be:

  • Internal: like the sales department that reports that it’s becoming too hard to sell the client, or technology constantly having to change features on projects that had a committed deadline.
  • External: like customer service calls ramping up or competitors becoming all of a sudden successful in areas where you dominated, thanks to a better approach to the business requirement.

So when is the right time to pivot?

  • I think it’s a gut feeling more than anything. As a founder, or as a CTO or VP of Engineering, you feel that something’s not right. Gather the group and talk openly about the issues.
  • When the project fails to hit specific goals in its allotted time. For this to work you need to be clear on your metrics: for example sales revenue goals or millions of unique visitors.
  • When your customers tell you to change. Don’t get too sold on your idea, be open to hear criticisms and embrace change. It might not mean that you’ll change your business plan every time a customer tells you to, but learn to see trends from your customer feedback.

The most important thing is not to trash everything you’ve done. A pivot, in essence is changing direction by leaning on what you’ve learned. In basketball, the pivot is done by rotating the body, but anchoring one foot in the ground. If a pivot means starting a completely new idea, don’t do it. But sometimes a small change of direction can mean the difference of continuing afloat or joining the startup graveyard.

In a recursive theme, this blog post is a pivot to this blog. I’ve decided, after three years of blogging about technology in general that I want to start writing about all the things I’ve learned as a tech lead in startups in the last 10 years. If you want to keep reading about social media and technology in general, there are many blogs out there that do a better job at it. But if you work in startup, either you’re a founder or you’re thinking about starting one, I will be a good resource as I go through my experience in participating in the crazy world of technology entrepreneurship.

{ 0 comments }

I Ain’t Goin’ Nowhere

October 16, 2011
Thumbnail image for I Ain’t Goin’ Nowhere

Blogs are becoming harder and harder to maintain. Some are calling blogs dead. My blog hasn’t been the exception. It’s not that I don’t have ideas that I want to continue discussing with you, my faithful readers. It’s more that the platforms where to put those ideas are becoming more and more powerful. Take a [...]

Read the full article →

FTP Upgrading of WordPress on AWS Instances

July 4, 2010

For months I was annoyed at the inability of my WordPress installation to automatically upgrade both plugins as well as the core installation. Every time I had to do a core upgrade of WordPress, I would manually download the zip file, unpack, copy the wp-contents and wp-config files and then take care of any outdated [...]

Read the full article →

Why I Hate Traffic Spikes

November 30, 2009

There is a rush when you see a post that gets a lot of attention. I remember Hutch Carpenter experiencing something similar when he had his “Cisco Fatty” post.

But after the moment passes and you look back, there’s a bunch of negative things that slowly emerge from the experience. I will share with you some of the ones I have thought of.

Read the full article →

Why Ranking Matters

October 15, 2009
Thumbnail image for Why Ranking Matters

We live in a world full of statistics. We’re always measuring ourselves against our competitors and most of the time success is tied with performance and relative positions.

The web is specially a place where everything is measurable. Every click, visit, pageview, source can be added, combined and reported.

Read the full article →

Feeling Secure with the Latest WordPress Version? Think Again (and 7 Tips to Secure it)

September 21, 2009
Thumbnail image for Feeling Secure with the Latest WordPress Version? Think Again (and 7 Tips to Secure it)

Late on Friday, I read a post from Allen Stern in FriendFeed saying that his blog, CenterNetworks had been, once again, injected with spam links. Allen runs his blog on the latest Wordpress installation, 2.8.4, which we all figured was really secure.

I had upgraded barely a week ago, so I instantly checked my blog and lo and behold, I had been hacked as well.

There is something inherently wrong with Wordpress’ code if it’s this easy to hack it, even with the tightest security measures, which in my case, include the top 5 of the 7 items listed below. I felt completely let down by Wordpress and for a moment thought that it’s time for me to move on to something else for my blog.

I’m giving Wordpress a last chance, and have enforced the following security measures to see how it goes, and I highly recommend you enable these as well if you are running Wordpress.

Read the full article →

PubSubHubbub + WordPress + Feedburner + FriendFeed = Realtime Awesomeness

July 27, 2009
Thumbnail image for PubSubHubbub + WordPress + Feedburner + FriendFeed = Realtime Awesomeness

PubSubHubbub is a fancy name for a rather new protocol being promoted by various services like FriendFeed, which allows you to receive updates of RSS feeds without polling.

Basically it will allow blogs and readers to communicate real time, in a push-like method, like instant messaging, and not via pulls like the way it happens now (which can take minutes or even hours).

The cool thing about PubSubHubbub is that it works on top of existing protocols (in this case Atom) so readers and source don’t have to change much. The only thing you need is to notify a server that you published and the clients have to be subscribed to that server. Dave Winer has a good, deeper, explanation of how it works.

In this tutorial I will show you how to implement PubSubHubbub in a self-hosted installation of Wordpress, using Feedburner for feed distribution and FriendFeed as the receiving client. With this system in place, your blog posts will appear in your FriendFeed in a matter of seconds.

Read the full article →

The Audience/Complexity Ratio and Your Ideal Point of Broadcast

July 24, 2009
Thumbnail image for The Audience/Complexity Ratio and Your Ideal Point of Broadcast

Yesterday I was listening to one of Leo Laporte‘s podcasts, which I believe is broadcast nationally on radio as well. I had several times seen him record it in his Twit video channel, but had never listened to him without seeing him.

Two things struck me as I listened.

First, that Leo has a very cool radio voice. Trent Hamm, a FriendFeed user, described it perfectly: “strong, deep, authoritative tones, yet still warm and inviting”.

Second, that Leo’s technologic complexity on the show is right in the middle: not too complex, not too simple.

Leo is really admired and has a very loyal and large following. He has 137,000+ followers on Twitter and this Twit shows are always buzzing with people who ask him stuff, but also help him in things he doesn’t know.

I think Leo knows more about technology than he shows or broadcasts. He has his ideal point really figured out. Of course, he’s done it for years, first on ZDTV, then TechTV and now with his own channels.

I’m thinking about many other technology newsmakers with decent following and they always seem, to me, that they weren’t advanced in their technology knowledge. They’re not hardcore programmers like I am.

Read the full article →

The Loyalty Index: Why it Should Be One of your Top Numbers

July 20, 2009
Thumbnail image for The Loyalty Index: Why it Should Be One of your Top Numbers

Back in the early days of the web, I worked in this small startup funded by a large public company. Life was good. We were pioneers heading into an uncharted jungle.

One of the first things we were discussing was how to measure the success of our web operation. Back then a lot of people were talking about “hits”, which seemed like a bad metric, as each hit would be an individual element on the page (like a page with 4 images would result in 5 hits). We decided to use pageviews instead.

We also knew we wanted to track unique visitors per month (i.e. if one visitor visits 5 times in a month, he’s counted as 1). This would tell us how many actual visitors were coming to our site.

But we knew there was something missing from this picture. We also wanted to know how well we were keeping our users “hooked” into our content. We decided to also have repeat visitors as part of our top goals and measurements.

This really worked. Even though the site was content centric (it was a network of radio station websites), we managed to add a lot of social features to it, so that users had a reason to come back often.

Today, I don’t hear about repeat visits any more in any of the business circles I move in. I hear a lot about user engagement and “let’s get a ton of traffic” or “how do I get more followers”.

Read the full article →

If Your Content is Monetizable, You Might Have a Shot at the Free Model

July 14, 2009
Thumbnail image for If Your Content is Monetizable, You Might Have a Shot at the Free Model

There’s no such thing as Free. There is always a catch.

Malcolm Gladwell wrote a very provocative piece on The New Yorker about Wired’s Editor In Chief Chris Anderson’s book about the Free model: “Free: The Future of a Radical Price“.

In the article, Gladwell critizices Anderson’s ideas, specifically applied to YouTube’s case:

When you let people upload and download as many videos as they want, lots of them will take you up on the offer. That’s the magic of Free psychology: an estimated seventy-five billion videos will be served up by YouTube this year. Although the magic of Free technology means that the cost of serving up each video is “close enough to free to round down,” “close enough to free” multiplied by seventy-five billion is still a very large number.

In another section, Gladwell talks specifically about his world: journalism. Anderson writes on his book: “If so, leveraging the Free—paying people to get other people to write for non-monetary rewards—may not be the enemy of professional journalists. Instead, it may be their salvation”, to which Gladwell responds:

It is not entirely clear what distinction is being marked between “paying people to get other people to write” and paying people to write. If you can afford to pay someone to get other people to write, why can’t you pay people to write?

Anderson quickly replied to Gladwell on Wired’s blog with a provoking post: “Dear Malcolm: Why so threatened?“:

So that’s the difference between “paying people to write” and “paying people to get other people to write”. Somewhere down the chain, the incentives go from monetary to nonmonetary (attention, reputation, expression, etc).

Let me stop there and try to bring you a better level where we can start this conversation.

Read the full article →