From the category archives:

Twitter

Post image for Twitter Retweet: A ‘Like’ Function in Steroids

Twitter Retweet: A ‘Like’ Function in Steroids

by Jorge Escobar on November 11, 2009

One of the pillars of Social Tools is discovery. You have built a network of like-minded (or influential) people around you, you start striking conversations with them and you start getting the feel of belonging.

But of course, your network is 10 times bigger and more interesting, because of the second and third levels of people’s connections.

“Like” is one of the killer features of FriendFeed. It allowed me to discover new people’s content and I made really close connections to dozens of them. Facebook eventually copied the functionality, even though is not as useful in context as FriendFeed’s.

Since the beginning of Twitter, people found a way to hack the system, by introducing the ‘@’ sign to address users and putting ‘RT’ in front to give attribution of an interesting piece of content.

It took a while, but Twitter has finally given us a way to standardize the process and support it from within its data model. And it’s still called the same: Retweet.

According to this post by Evan Williams (Twitter’s co-founder), Twitter’s Retweet function will have several benefits:

  • It will solve the noise problem: A lot of times, Twitter feels like the echo chamber from hell. Just yesterday I tweeted “Can you guys stop RT’ing items that are broadcast by users followed by more than 100k users? It’s a very slim chance we didn’t read it”. Now with the Retweet function, you will only get the first copy of something retweeted multiple times by people you follow.
  • Attribution: If you put out a good tweet and it’s Retweeted, you are exposed to dozens or even thousands of people with your own profile and avatar information, which will allow potential users to follow you with one click.
  • Tracking: There’s a lot of information inherent in retweeting that Twitter and other organizations can leverage in terms of data mining; like discovering really useful content (which echoes my last post about the death of PageRank) and useful content producers (which could become influentials and put on lists and so forth)

This is what a Retweet looks like in my Twitter homepage:

twitter-retweet-2

I don’t know @debbieweil, but I immediately see that @shashib, who I know, retweeted her. At this point I can subscribe to her or see her feed or start a conversation with her. It’s a very powerful feature.

Remember what I said about the data mining? One immediate effect is the new Retweet link (that will appear beneath your Favorites link). It has three tabs and allows you to see your Retweets, your Tweets that have been Retweeted and what your friends are Retweeting. This last one is a great way to find great emerging content.

twitter-retweet-3

Some people are complaining about the fact that you can’t modify or edit the Retweet, or put context around it. I think in some cases this is a valid shortcoming, and Evan comments about it:

What about those cases where you really want to add a comment when RTing something? Keep in mind, there’s nothing stopping you from simply quoting another tweet if that’s what you want to do. Also, old-school retweets are still allowed, as well. We had to prioritize some use cases over others in this release. But just as Twitter didn’t have this functionality at all before, people can still work around and do whatever they want. This just gives another option.

Evan also says that they will be evaluating how people use it and potentially change it based on users feedback.

The other thing he mentions is that all Twitter clients (Seesmic, Tweetdeck) are actively working on implementing this on their clients. Keep in mind that this is a feature that hasn’t been released yet to the general public. I’m sure we’ll all have it very soon.

I think that Twitter is moving (along with their other killer feature, Lists) in the right direction and that it’s simpleness will keep attracting users to the service. I for one am a born-again Twitterer.

Here’s a great post that talks more about this new functionality.

{ 6 comments }

Ding-Dong, SEO and PageRank Are Dead

October 30, 2009
Thumbnail image for Ding-Dong, SEO and PageRank Are Dead

Even as users still question whether real-time is hoopla or really transforming, I think the future is clear: real-time’s most impact will be on search.

And Google is showing up signs of distress.

First they tried to buy Twitter. That was the best move they could’ve tried. Unfortunately its founders were not impressed and really believed in their company. Reportedly they said they wouldn’t sell for a billion dollars.

Google could just scoff and carry on, right? Wrong. They need real-time because that’s where search is moving.

Read the full article →

I’m A Social Media Castaway

September 14, 2009
Thumbnail image for I’m A Social Media Castaway

This is my first post in a month and I wanted to look back at what’s happened in the social media environment in the last 30 days.

Basically, nothing.

The truth is I needed a break, because (I’m sure you’ve heard it before) keeping up with social media can have its toll on your productivity.

Sometimes I think the whole thing goes out of hand.

You need to be up to speed with hundreds of friends, keep with hundreds of feeds, update your blog several times a week, and then there’s work and family.

I felt guilty, lost and anxious. What are they talking about? Do they miss me?

But I needed to get things done. There was a huge relaunch happening. A new project being developed. A site that was closing.

Today I feel more balanced.

Read the full article →

An Adventure Unfollowing All The People I Followed on Twitter (Without a Happy Ending)

August 3, 2009
Thumbnail image for An Adventure Unfollowing All The People I Followed on Twitter (Without a Happy Ending)

No, I’m not saying Twitter is dead by a long shot.

But it has changed.

It has now become the playfield of a thousand cheap marketers, social media “experts” and 10,000 people who auto-follow the other 10,000 people.

It’s a tangled mess.

Yes, we have tools like Tweetdeck and Seesmic which allows us to create lists of users. However, because Twitter does not support groups, I always feel like I don’t have portability of those lists (even though Tweetdeck allows you to save them to their server, or is it Seesmic). But in any event, I always feel like there are important Tweets being dropped by this layer on top of layer approach.

Plus my firehose is just filled with junk and noise.

So about a week ago, I decided I was gonna clean the slate and start from scratch. I would get back to zero followers. The first thing I did was ask the FriendFeed community, as using Twitter’s tools would take me forever to unfollow 900+ users.

Read the full article →

The Audience/Complexity Ratio and Your Ideal Point of Broadcast

July 24, 2009
Thumbnail image for The Audience/Complexity Ratio and Your Ideal Point of Broadcast

Yesterday I was listening to one of Leo Laporte’s podcasts, which I believe is broadcast nationally on radio as well. I had several times seen him record it in his Twit video channel, but had never listened to him without seeing him.

Two things struck me as I listened.

First, that Leo has a very cool radio voice. Trent Hamm, a FriendFeed user, described it perfectly: “strong, deep, authoritative tones, yet still warm and inviting”.

Second, that Leo’s technologic complexity on the show is right in the middle: not too complex, not too simple.

Leo is really admired and has a very loyal and large following. He has 137,000+ followers on Twitter and this Twit shows are always buzzing with people who ask him stuff, but also help him in things he doesn’t know.

I think Leo knows more about technology than he shows or broadcasts. He has his ideal point really figured out. Of course, he’s done it for years, first on ZDTV, then TechTV and now with his own channels.

I’m thinking about many other technology newsmakers with decent following and they always seem, to me, that they weren’t advanced in their technology knowledge. They’re not hardcore programmers like I am.

Read the full article →

Stop Crying About Followers Already

July 9, 2009
Thumbnail image for Stop Crying About Followers Already

Let’s face it: social media is about our own personal or corporate egos.

A couple of days ago @nickleung asked me:

Since you’re an online expert, do you have any advice on how I can build a community for FeedbackJar.com?

I immediately answered: Interactive Feedback. That means listening and talking in a two-way channel.

I had recently come across this article by Dan Martell where he talks about how feedback is “the secret weapon for startups”. The truth is it’s not only for startups and it’s not a secret.

He gives five recommendations to enable a feedback loop. The last one is the most important: “Listening Online”.

But it’s not just listening. It’s participating.

Read the full article →

An Audience is an Audience, Be it on FriendFeed or Anywhere Else

June 20, 2009
Thumbnail image for An Audience is an Audience, Be it on FriendFeed or Anywhere Else

I almost had a heart attack on Thursday night when I went to check my Feedburner Stats. I had been hovering around 60 subscribers with one or two added every week. But that day Feedburner announced that suddenly I had 354 subscribers.

What had happened? Did my blog get recommended on some influential blogger’s list? Had my blog been mentioned on the New York Times?

Read the full article →

Facebook’s (And Other Social Platform’s) Preferential Treatment Should Not Be Ignored

June 11, 2009
Thumbnail image for Facebook’s (And Other Social Platform’s) Preferential Treatment Should Not Be Ignored

Unless you’ve been living under a rock or haven’t paid your Internet provider or don’t have a Facebook account (that leaves about 2% of you out there surfing the web) you already know about Facebook’s announcement to finally give users the option to have a vanity URL, i.e. www.facebook.com/your.username

According to the blog post, there are some rules:

Facebook usernames will be available in basic text forms, and you can only choose a single username for your profile and for each of the Pages that you administer. Your username must be at least five characters in length and only include alphanumeric characters (A-Z, 0-9), or a period or full stop (“.”). While usernames are currently available only for Romanized text, we’re looking at how we might support non-Romanized characters in the future.

I remembered a while back that Oprah had gotten a vanity URL before a lot of us. But that’s fine because she is Oprah.

But then yesterday on FriendFeed I read that Allen Stern was asking Gary V. how he’d gotten his vanity URL. Some of us weighed in saying that Gary’s page, like Oprah’s, was a not a username, but a Fan Page vanity URL. Allen asked how you could get one and I thought I’d read that anyone can get a Fan Page, but you must have at least 1,000 followers to get the vanity URL.

But shortly after, Jesse Stay chimed in. He has 1,000 followers and has never been able to talk to anyone in Facebook to get a vanity URL. Wait, what?

Read the full article →

Read/Write Twitter: Twitter’s real value is up to you

April 29, 2009
Thumbnail image for Read/Write Twitter: Twitter’s real value is up to you

I wanted to wait until all the smoke cleared and the hype blown away.

It all started when one of my tweeps asked me in a DM:

digital-femme

Carmen, sorry for the late reply. I think I don’t mind.

You see, Twitter is the platform, it’s not the the object. I do think people understand Twitter as different things, depending on what they intend to use it for.

Read the full article →

Why Your Post Titles Are More Important Than Ever

March 18, 2009
Thumbnail image for Why Your Post Titles Are More Important Than Ever

Yesterday, influential blogger Louis Gray announced on FriendFeed that he wanted recommendations for Tech blogs, so that he could pick five of them to be featured on his blog.

When I headed over, he had indeed added my blog to his list. A list with more than a thousand feeds.

Read the full article →